Presenters: (From left to right): Tom Nesbit, editor of the Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education; Ian MacLachlan, editor of the Canadian Geographer; Jim Frideres, editor of the Canadian Ethnic Studies Journal.
Moderator: Kel Morin-Parsons, manager of the CFHSS Aid to Scholarly Publications Program.
Jump to a video:
0:00 - 2:41 Intro, format of the talk2:41 - 4:38 Use of a panel of experts as reviewers4:38 - 7:36 Reviewing a manuscript takes a long time7:36 - 8:53 Use of editorial board to suggest reviewers
0:00 - 3:13 Time scale from the receipt of the manuscript to when it gets published3:13 - 7:42 Format restrictions when submitting an article to a journal
0:00 - 3:46 Very few manuscripts are rejected without reviews
0:00 - 2:23 Be sure to cite article in the journal that you are submitting to2:23 - 3:33 Aim high: Submit to the top-tiered journal in your field3:33 - 4:38 Read articles that have been previously published in that journal4:38 - 6:42 Only submit to one publication at a time
0:00 - 1:38 Depends on the quality of the review1:38 - 3:05 Reviewers have different ways of writing an assessment3:05 - 5:30 You lean towards reviews that are compelling5:30 - 6:41 Reviewers need to take a critical look at each submission
0:00 - 1:07 Not all journals are publishing online yet1:07 - 3:43 Soon all journal content will be online3:43 - 5:42 Online content is important, but so is having the printed journal
0:00 - 3:18 Revising and resubmitting an article is often encouraged3:18 - 4:40 What to do when you receive an editor's request4:40 - 5:30 Take the revise & re-submit request seriously5:30 - 8:45 Clearly outline the changes you have made when you re-submit
Click analysis