If asked to name the world’s greatest artist, many would answer Leonardo da Vinci. Because of his varied talents he is often viewed as the personification of the term “Renaissance man.” In light of this exalted status, it may be surprising to learn that da Vinci struggled with procrastination. He consistently imagined and started projects only to abandon them, leaving a litany of unfinished paintings, sculptures and building designs in his wake. The Mona Lisa was 15 years in the making. Worse was The Virgin of the Rocks, a painting commissioned with a seven-month deadline. He finished it 25 years later. Shockingly, although da Vinci lived to age 67, he completed only 15 paintings and a handful of architectural designs.
The realization that even geniuses like da Vinci can fall prey to procrastination indicates how pervasive an affliction it is. Whether it is the late filing of taxes, last-second cramming for exams or postponing an assignment to binge-watch a season of Game of Thrones, most of us have found ourselves locked in that familiar cycle of purposeful delay, self-recrimination and regret – and the strain of the ongoing pandemic is likely not helping things.
Piers Steel, a professor of human resources and organizational dynamics, and holder of the Brookfield Research Chair at the University of Calgary’s Haskayne School of Business, defines procrastination as not just any delay but an irrational one – that is, when we voluntarily put off tasks despite believing that we will be worse off for doing so. “When we procrastinate, we know that we’re acting against our best interests,” says Dr. Steel.
In his 2010 book, The Procrastination Equation: How To Stop Putting Things Off and Start Getting Things Done, Dr. Steel says surveys reveal that about 95 percent of people admit to procrastinating at least some of the time. But within that broad group there is a subset of people who consider procrastination to be a defining characteristic of their personalities. In the 1970s, surveys indicated that only five percent of the population felt they belonged in this chronic category, says Dr. Steel. Today, that figure has risen to about 20 percent.
Chronic procrastinators are people whose tendency to postpone permeates all aspect of their lives. “It’s a maladaptive lifestyle. They do it at home, school or work, and in relationships or with responsibilities,” says Joseph Ferrari, a professor of psychology at DePaul University in Chicago, who is alarmed by the number of people affected. “Let’s put that 20 percent figure in perspective,” he says. “It’s higher than the number of people who suffer from substance abuse, alcoholism or depression, which are all considered serious disorders.”
The emotional-regulation view of procrastination helps explain some strange modern phenomena, such as the incredibly popular fad of watching online cat videos. In 2014, there were more than two million cat videos posted on YouTube that attracted close to 26 billion views. In 2015, Jessica Myrick at the media school at Indiana University Bloomington surveyed 7,000 people about their viewing of cat videos and how it affects their moods. Her findings, which were published in the scholarly journal Computers in Human Behavior, confirmed procrastination as a common motive for viewing the cat videos, and that watching them led to a boost in mood. As Myrick wrote: “If people were watching a cat video because they were procrastinating, but that cat video made them feel really happy, it tended to cancel out the guilt they felt from procrastinating. They still reported that cat video viewing as a really enjoyable entertainment experience,” she says. “That was a new wrinkle in the literature on procrastination and media effects.”
And yet, Dr. Ferrari says there is a peculiar resistance in scientific circles to taking the subject seriously, a tendency that has not changed much since he first began investigating the topic in the late 1980s. “I’m not sure what it is. It may be that so many academics suffer from procrastination that the subject hits too close to home.”
What has changed in recent years is the notion that procrastination is caused by poor time management or some moral failing. Instead, most researchers now contend that procrastination is a complex psychological issue. Tim Pychyl, an associate professor of psychology at Carleton University and author of the 2013 book Solving the Procrastination Puzzle: A Concise Guide to Strategies for Change, says that procrastination is caused by an inability to properly regulate emotions. “We put off a task because it makes us feel bad – perhaps it’s boring, or difficult, or we’re worried about failing – and to make ourselves feel better in the moment, we start doing something else, like watching videos,” says Dr. Pychyl, who also writes the Don’t Delay blog for Psychology Today. “But this is a self-defeating coping strategy, because it only works in the short term – the task doesn’t go away. Eventually, you’re left with the task to complete, the negative emotions again, plus the added stress of a time constraint.”
“Begin doing what you want to do now. We are not living in eternity. We have only this moment, sparkling like a star in our hand – and melting like a snowflake.”
Francis Bacon, English philosopher
Why are humans so prone to this sort of self-sabotage? Recent experiments using functional MRI conducted by Hal Hershfield, a social psychologist and associate professor of marketing at UCLA’s Anderson School of Management, have shed some new light on the question. Dr. Hershfield discovered that when we process information about our present and future selves, different sections of the brain are activated. That may sound logical, but what is surprising is that the part of the brain that lights up when we imagine our future self is the same as the one that activates when we imagine a stranger. This quirk in our neural network allows our present self to feel free to satisfy its immediate desires at the expense of our future self, who presumably may have more energy and more time to devote to the task that our present self is avoiding.
Dr. Pychyl believes that gaining a better understanding of the neurobiology of the brain will help psychologists develop strategies for combating procrastination. In the meantime, he and his colleagues are getting a clearer picture of what sort of person is most likely to procrastinate. Although the affliction cuts across occupations, nationalities and ages, there are some constants. In 2007, Dr. Steel published a review of almost 800 studies on procrastination that ultimately identified four character traits that make procrastination more likely: low self-confidence, task aversiveness, a high degree of distractibility and impulsiveness, and an inability to set realistic and immediate goals.
All of these traits make some people prime targets for the hypnotic allure of today’s glittering technology. Dr. Steel says that the proliferation of smartphones and various social media has ushered in a whole new order of temptations that are cleverly designed to break down self-discipline. These temptations exploit the limbic system, the part of the brain that governs our emotional responses and drives the impulse to live for the moment, which Dr. Steel believes has boosted the incidences of procrastination.
Not everyone agrees. Dr. Ferrari at DePaul thinks the notion that technology makes it easier to procrastinate is a fallacy. “There’s always been technology to make things easier – think how the telephone helped reduce the need for writing letters, cars helped replace the horse and buggy, and the snooze button helped people delay getting out of bed. All those technologies were developed in the 19th or 20th centuries. Technology today doesn’t make it easier to procrastinate, it’s all about how you use or don’t use it.”
Dr. Steel believes this attitude discounts the seductive power of the digital world. “Every vulnerability that people have can now be codified,” he says. “It is now possible to develop detailed personal profiles of individuals in order to maximize the potential of advertising. There are 10 billion videos on the Web, yet because of targeting, only the most succulent will be presented to you.”
“Nothing is as fatiguing as the eternal hanging on of an uncompleted task.”
William James, American philosopher
There is more unanimity among psychologists about the scope of procrastination in the academic world – everyone agrees that it’s rampant. Dr. Pychyl goes so far as to call it “the number one problem in education today.” According to his research, students who procrastinate take longer to hand in assignments, spend more hours working on projects and on studying, have more unfinished assignments, and are more likely to engage in cheating and plagiarism. His research also suggests that these academic procrastinators aren’t all one personality type, but that they do share a couple of common traits: a lack of self-confidence and a belief that they have little control over their academic success.
Dr. Steel agrees that procrastination is especially rife among college students, with 80 to 95 percent of them suffering from it at least some of the time. He cites several reasons why they are so susceptible. “Students are still learning their self-regulatory skills. They are young and impulsive, and many have never lived on their own before. Also, essay writing is difficult and there is no guarantee that the hard work you do will actually be recognized by the professor.” Dr. Steel also believes that the structure of university courses, with distant dates for the completion of essays, encourages procrastination. Then, too, there is the distraction-filled environment that surrounds many students. “College dorms are infernos of procrastination because the enticements – alcohol, camaraderie, sex – are white hot.”
Rev me up
Changing an ingrained habit like procrastination is not easy, but Carleton University’s Tim Pychyl is convinced it can be done. He offers one important tip. The next time you’re tempted to procrastinate, “make your focus as simple as ‘What’s the next action I would take on this task if I were to get started on it now?’” Doing this, he says, takes your mind off your feelings and onto easily achievable action. “Our research and lived experience show very clearly that once we get started, we’re typically able to keep going. Getting started is everything.”
“Seventy percent of the time when a student gives an excuse for not getting something done, they are lying,” says Dr. Ferrari. “My printer died last night. My grandmother died, again. The problem is that most profs never ask for proof. They let it slide.”
The procrastination plague may exact an especially heavy levy on graduate students, where the term ABD (all but dissertation) has become distressingly commonplace, says Dr. Steel, leaving about 50 percent of grad students without a degree after several years of dedicated study.
Procrastination is also prevalent among faculty members. “I call professors ‘unregulated scientific entrepreneurs,’” says Dr. Steel. “They’re prone to procrastination because they do not suffer any immediate repercussions for failing to produce papers. They have slippery deadlines.”
The consequences of not completing tasks on time or not finishing them at all can take a physical toll on people’s health. Some of those effects have been measured by psychologist Fuschia Sirois, formerly of Bishop’s University and the University of Windsor who is now at Sheffield University in the U.K. “In one study we found that students who scored high on a measure of chronic procrastination reported a greater number of acute health problems such as headaches, muscle aches and strains, digestive issues, and flus and colds,” says Dr. Sirois.
In a 2015 study of nearly 800 people in Canada and the United States, Dr. Sirois found evidence that trait procrastination – a tendency to delay important tasks despite the negative consequences – was associated with having hypertension and cardiovascular disease. The findings held true even after controlling for factors such as age, ethnicity and key personality traits.
Dr. Sirois theorizes that procrastinators are likely to put off important health behaviours like going to the doctor and getting regular exercise. She also suspects that chronic procrastinators cope poorly with the constant stress caused by delay. “They get caught in a cycle of negative self-talk and can be very self-critical, which doesn’t help.” Feelings of guilt and shame may surface. “For chronic procrastinators, it only feeds back into the negative emotions that led them to procrastinate in the first place, thus fueling a vicious circle,” says Dr. Sirois.
“I love deadlines. I love the whooshing sound they make as they fly by.”
Douglas Adams, author of The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy.
Even so, you don’t have to be a chronic procrastinator to suffer lingering psychological effects. As Dr. Pychyl notes: “I did my PhD on goal pursuits and how it affected well-being. I interviewed a number of doctoral students. They said that the bane of their existence was the tremendous amount of guilt they suffered because of procrastination. It’s a destructive emotion. It affects our well-being and our health.”
In a 2016 TED talk, blogger and self-confessed procrastinator Tim Urban touched on this when he discussed an insidious kind of procrastination that seeps in when there’s no deadline and no reason to panic. For some reason or another, we simply never get around to doing what we set out to. It’s particularly damaging for freelancers and artists – careers that rely on self-starting – but also afflicts people outside of work, in how they handle their health and relationships. “Long-term procrastination makes people feel like spectators in their own lives,” says Mr. Urban. “The frustration isn’t that they couldn’t achieve their dreams, it’s that they could never start chasing them.”
Sadly, for some the message arrives too late. Leonardo da Vinci could surely have benefited from some sage psychological advice, and the world at large would have reaped the reward. Instead, he was consumed by regret. The most damning condemnation of his condition came from the master himself, who on his deathbed apologized “to God and Man for leaving so much undone.”
In the midst of a pandemic when there are so many uncertainties, stresses and challenges, suggesting that people get over their tendency to procrastinate seems unkind at best. So what if we are slower to do things or don’t get everything done. Academics are chronic over-achievers. The world has changed and for those with responsibility for the care of others the last thing they need to hear is get over yourself and stop procrastinating.
Fascinating Article! I feel like it really got me to think about procrastination in a very nuanced way. I will certainly try the tip they include for reducing procrastination. I think this article is so important right now as the pandemic has definitely increased the amount of procrastination I am doing and means that more time that could be taken up with things I genuinely enjoy is being spent toggling between social media sites while I think how I should be working…
I think the article was saying that procrastination really causes the procrastinator a lot of stress and discomfort so if they can reduce the amount of procrastinating they do, they would feel better. I feel that the pandemic has also overloaded people with new work challenges so if there’s ways to reduce procrastinating, this might be a really important time to try.
It is a very individualistic analysis. Most jobs are bullshit jobs, the pressures from workplaces and private live are extremely high, there is more and more to do – and people don’t get a break. And now they are being told they are procrastinating when in fact what we all would need is more time to actually do nothing without the guilt attached to it. So instead of calling for shorter work hours, sabbaticals, secure part time positions with meaningful careers, time off for parents for small children with full compensation, time off for caregivers in general with full compensation the author blames the individuals. And the pressures on academics is massive, if you are contract faculty you run from one course to another. If you are tenure track you have one committee after another and faculty/student ratios are increasing and students needs more and more support. It is just too much.
In reply to Carol Strike: Although the pandemic may well have increased the incidence of procrastination (I have no idea), clearly Kerry Banks’ main point is independent of that potential effect. If there had been no pandemic beginning in the early spring he would not have had to change his text at all!