Skip navigation
News

Survey asks: Who is the Canadian postdoctoral fellow?

Lack of data makes it difficult to craft good policy to meet postdocs’ needs, say organizers.

BY DAVID KENT | APR 08 2013

In 2009, the newly created Canadian Association of Postdoctoral Scholars undertook its first survey of postdoctoral fellows, or PDFs. The results revealed that the average fellow in Canada was between 30 and 35 years of age, earned under $40,000 and had limited access to extended health coverage or other benefits.

This workplace snapshot was taken at a time of great unrest for PDFs, as the federal government had recently changed its taxation policy to make student scholarships – but not postdoctoral fellowships – tax-exempt. As a result, a substantial cohort of PhD graduates who continued in academic research as PDFs now earned less pay than they received during their graduate student years.

In an effort to see if the situation has changed, CAPS has launched a new survey of PDFs and is encouraging all postdoctoral fellows in Canada to take part. Jeremy Mitchell, former chair of CAPS and leader of the current survey, said there is a pressing need for more complete and up-to-date data. “During my stint as chair, I had to spend a lot of time thinking about how varied the circumstances and priorities of different PDFs can be,” he said. “How does a university craft policies that meet all those different needs? How does Canada? We need to start with a clear picture of who Canadian postdocs are.”

The survey is being carried out with the assistance of the not-for-profit organization Mitacs and the higher-education consulting firm Academica.

Before the 2009 survey, there was only limited evidence about the plight of Canadian PDFs. The survey, which was completed by nearly 1,200 PDFs, gave substance to the arguments of researchers that they weren’t being adequately supported. This was followed by several negative reports, such as in Nature magazine, on Canada’s lack of support for PDFs and also led the formation of groups such as CAPS and the Canadian Association of Postdoctoral Administrators.

Canada is not the only country facing these human resources issues. In the life sciences sector in the U.S., it is common for PDFs to undertake more than one transient position, often in different cities, and spend five-plus years vying for a tenure-track position that only a minority will actually obtain – all of this occurring after their lengthy PhD training (a median of nearly seven years in 2011, according to the U.S. National Institutes of Health). The average age for a researcher in the U.S. to get their first RO1 operating grant – the main grants from the NIH – is currently 42 years.

The lack of data in Canada

Perhaps the best example of how little is understood about PDFs in Canada is that the 2009 survey estimated there were 6,000 PDFs working in Canada. However, as reported at the inaugural CAPA meeting last year, university administrators put that number closer to 9,000, which is likely still an underestimate as many PDFs come with international funding or work as industrial fellows outside of universities.

Rob Annan, vice-president for research and policy at Mitacs, praises CAPS for undertaking the new survey. “There is so little data on the experience of Canadian PDFs, and this represents a significant gap in our understanding of the research and higher education landscape,” he said.

The current chair of CAPS, Chris Corkery, said the primary goal during his tenure “has been to improve the quality and reach of our representation of postdoctoral scholars. We’ve increased interactions with the Tri-Council funding agencies, CAPA, individual institutions, and international postdoctoral associations.” CAPS also now holds regular conference calls and an annual meeting that connects individual university PDF associations with each other.

The need for data stretches beyond policy as many PDFs are having to make career choices without adequate information. “A tightening academic job market combined with increased PhD graduation levels means career planning and preparation will need to adapt,” said Mitacs’ Dr. Annan. “But making informed decisions about how to adapt – both at the individual and policy level – requires data.”

The transient and focused nature of postdoctoral positions presents a challenge to collecting data, said Julie Peters at Academica. “The greatest challenge we face [in the survey] is the reality that there is no comprehensive list of PDFs in Canada,” she said. “In the absence of this, there is always the danger of missing an important segment of the population. That is why it is so important to get the survey out through multiple channels to try and reach PDFs at a large variety of institutions and in different types of positions.”

COMMENTS
Post a comment
University Affairs moderates all comments according to the following guidelines. If approved, comments generally appear within one business day. We may republish particularly insightful remarks in our print edition or elsewhere.

Your email address will not be published.

  1. J / April 8, 2013 at 22:23

    This is a direct result of the Harper Government. They seem to be trying to stop science in Canada. Sad.

  2. Kmich / April 10, 2013 at 11:05

    I fully support the survey. It is a good opportunity to collect adequate information in order to make insightful proposals to meet PDF’s needs. One of the major hurdles I faced is the lack of understanding of a PDF’s role, position and nature of job which is a shared criterion among various governmental bodies, such as CIC, CRA, etc. I appreciate CAPS initiatives to tackle that delicate issue by running a fully comprehensive survey.

  3. Jim Clark / April 10, 2013 at 14:44

    Surely the major problem for Post Docs, including those desiring a PD position, is the lack of funding. In 2011, the NSERC success rate was less than 10%, far below the 34% success rate a decade ago (see Table 36 in http://www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca/_doc/FactsFigures-TableauxDetailles/2010-2011Tables_e.pdf). The demand from big universities (??) for bigger (excessive?) grants for the Canada Research Chairs and Canada Excellence Research Chairs is simply undermining the Post Doc situation (as well as the standard granting programs). The big universities are, of course, just ruining future prospects for the majority of their own graduate students who end up without a post-doc or teaching at smaller universities that are being starved for research funding.

  4. Maryam / April 23, 2013 at 21:23

    I fully support this survey and I hope one day, we will see the effective results and save PDF’s life and career. What I do understand from the system in canada is- that PDFs are cheap researcher who usually get funded by different agency, but the supervisor. The moment funding run out, they have to leave the lab since the PI do not want to pay from his grants. Here in canada, I do recognize that PDF they do not get ready and prepare for Industry/academia career and sometimes due to healthy competition, PDF has to leave science!!! I do know many bright researches who are sitting at home after PDF. sometimes, Postdocs are people who prepare projects ready for Ph.D. student and by the time that Ph.D. student arrives, PDF has to leave the lab without any publication!!! Whit this system Canada is losing lots of researchers; majority of them are going to united states or they change career completely which in either way is the LOST for the SYSTEM!!! hope one day that changes!! hope one day, you ask and investigate each lab and survey how PDFs are doing? how much professional development have happened in their career!!!