The increase in mental health problems among university students over the past decade or so has received considerable attention, both in the academic literature and in the media. Since arriving at Carleton University in 2008, I too have noticed increasing numbers of students in my classes who seem exceptionally challenged by the general rigours of university life. I hear many requests from students who wish to receive accommodations – exam deferrals, assignment re-submissions, re-weighting of poor grades – because they are, or have been, “too stressed.” I get the sense that some students believe that, unless they are feeling 100 percent and acting under optimal circumstances, they have the right to defer an exam or rewrite an assignment. Why is this happening?
My guess is that part of the reason may be an unintended consequence of awareness around mental health. Over the last decade or so, our society has opened a dialogue around mental health, both in mainstream and social media. I have certainly noticed that the current generation of students is more open and aware – in my first-year class on the neuroscience of mental health and disease, I hear from many students who are willing to speak out about their own mental health challenges.
This is great and may eventually lead to a societal de-stigmatization of mental illness. However, I worry that it may also lead to the notion that feeling sad or stressed is “not normal.”
Allow me to elaborate. Stressors, be they physical or psychological, real or imagined, serve to signal to the organism that their survival may be at risk. In response, a surge of hormones and neurotransmitters are released to orchestrate the so called “fight or flight” response. While these signals are highly adaptive in the short-term, over time the prolonged activation of these systems in the brain and body (i.e., chronic stress) can contribute to disease. Moreover, exposure to acute extreme stress or trauma can also set up the organism for susceptibility to many physical and psychological illnesses, most notably depressive and anxiety disorders.
In this view, one might come to understand that stress is a bad thing. However, both in the neuroscience and psychological literature, there is good evidence that exposure to some forms of stress can in fact have the opposite consequences. Indeed, the stress inoculation theory argues that exposure to mild to moderate, controllable stress leads to an individual sense of mastery and promotes resilience in the future.
When our students face stressors of this type, such as multiple exams in one day or juggling the various demands of university life, they are presented with the opportunity to build their own resilience. Critically, facing these stressors, acknowledging and overcoming them, and reflecting on how they coped (or not), literally re-models the brain such that when students might be faced with future stressors, the nervous system is better prepared to not only mount a defence against the stressor but may also protect them from the detrimental effects of stress on disease susceptibility.
Imagine the analogy of weight-lifting: with the stress of an increase in the weight of a dumbbell, the bicep muscle literally incurs microscopic tears; these tears, when repaired by proteins, serve to increase the size of the muscle, therefore allowing it to lift heavier weights in the future. The same principle holds true with the brain: stressors strengthen the brain’s circuitry such that it can become more resilient to the exposure to future stressors. Thus, by avoiding stress altogether (e.g., writing an exam only under “optimal” circumstances), students may be denying themselves the ability to learn how to cope with stress, thus preventing the positive impact of stress inoculation.
What can we, as university professors, do? I believe that there are a number of strategies that we can employ, both in our course design and in our interactions with students, to boost resiliency among our students:
- Consider including a short discussion in your first lecture around the challenges of university life (this would be particularly beneficial in first-year courses) and the positive effects of stress. Emphasize that it is normal to feel stressed and occasionally overwhelmed, but that stress is important for motivating the organism and moderate amounts of stress increase performance in some cases.
- If your course has built-in, regular assignments or tests, consider offering a “best x out of y” grading scheme. For example, in my first-year neuroscience course, students must read 10 Scientific American articles throughout the semester and answer a question or two based on the article. Each assignment is worth two marks and contributes to 15 percent of their final grade. However, I tell the students that this will be based on the best eight out of 10 assignments. This allows students to “fail” (i.e., potentially not do as well) in a low-risk environment.
- One of the key factors that seems to be associated with resilience among healthy adults is social support. Consider encouraging peer study groups in your courses, either formally or informally. There may also be student-run or student-led resources on campus that employ a peer-support framework.
- This may seem simple, but design assessments that are appropriately challenging. Too easy and your students will learn quickly not to put in additional effort for your course (and/or perhaps others!); too hard and you risk promoting “learned helplessness” (learning that no matter how hard one studies, it won’t matter). An exam that is just challenging enough will leave many students with a feeling of accomplishment, particularly if they worked hard. Achieving the “just right” assessment can be tough, especially for first-time instructors or new courses; consider using the educational development support staff to assist you with the development of a rigorous and challenging assessment.
- Lifestyle factors such as diet, exercise, sleep and adequate rest are also critical in not only building resilience, but also supporting mental health in general. Find ways to remind students of the importance of a healthy lifestyle, either in conversation outside the classroom, a paragraph in your course outline, or creative insertion of these into your lectures. I have included a “Life Skills with Kim” component to my courses, where I take five or so minutes every once in a while to provide students with life advice such as “how to keep a healthy brain.” Better yet, be an example to your students and share with them your own lifestyle choices.
- Be informed of all the support services on campus. If you have a student who is genuinely struggling, there are a number of people and places on campus that are far better equipped to assess and, if necessary, diagnose than we are.
- Lastly, I would discourage anyone from allowing students repeated deadline extensions, or exam re-weighting or re-scheduling. We might think we’re helping, but we’re not – we’re teaching the student that not only can they avoid the stressor, but that achievement can only occur under ideal circumstances. Resilience is never built under ideal circumstances; as Theodore Roosevelt once said: “Nothing in the world is worth having or worth doing unless it means effort, pain, difficulty… I have never in my life envied a human being who led an easy life. I have envied a great many people who led difficult lives and led them well.”
These are only some suggestions – I’m sure there are others. If you have some, I’d love to hear from you.
Kim Hellemans is an instructor III and the Provost’s Teaching Fellow in the department of neuroscience at Carleton University.
There have been many years that I struggle to convince parents and principals that children should be given the opportunity to attend contests when regional clubs organize them. The school boards slogans such as “We encourage our students to reach their full potential” or “Anybody can succeed” are too vague in their good intentions, in a society where temptations and addictions based on immediate gratification, mislead fast the majority of children. Harsh discipline within the family is certainly not effective, but helping the child understand that 3 out of 4 is 75% goes a long way. With the need to “computerize” entry tests for some programs, students who never reflected upon the outcome of a B or 3- out of 4 throughout the grades they have previously graduated will find themselves on the rejected list while friends were accepted in the desired program. Thus, reasons like lack of maturity, doing some minimal class work or simply not bothering the teacher during the teaching periods, become insufficient in the positive development of the students and failure is a shock that traumatizes harder than expected in a short termed recovery.